Letter to the Editors of Scientific American

I have to question the responsibility of publishing more Michael F. Mann quotes. I am sure that many, including David Biello, believe that humankind is to fault with the world's problems, but a much larger issue has been exposed by "Climategate." First, that data which does not support AGW was misrepresented, destroyed, and withheld from the debate. More importantly, that the scientific process itself was not used to make the AGW argument because there was no open debate allowed.


We can debate the importance of swapping out data at the end of series and calling it a "trick." However, millions of lives will be lost every year if we proceed with AGW policies as money is spent that could save lives and improve the human condition.

Suppose AGW is wrong at this point. If this money is misallocated due to valid, debated scientific theory which turns out to be wrong, then I do not think blame can be laid. If money is misallocated at the cost of 1 human life for political or financial gain, then Mann, Hanson, the IPCC and others involved should be tried for murder. If the estimates of 4.1 million lives are lost per year due to the expenditure of money on AGW that would otherwise be spent for humanitarian causes, we are talking about a murder on a scale that rivals the worse collectivists of the last century.

I am an avid science enthusiast, but the disturbing collectivist and even communist support for AGW policies, coupled with the apparent fraud of "Climategate" gives me, and should give EVERYONE pause. This may be the same battle to tear freedom from humanity and devalue human life that America fought in 1941 and throughout the Cold War.

If you believe in humanity, we will solve these problems through innovation. If you do NOT believe in your fellow man, then population control and other, horrific but logical rationales will be used as government tries to solve these problems. So, please use this magazine to foster debate and not to evangelize for one side.


Charles Fettinger
Entrepreneur
San Diego, CA

Providence?

Sen. Kennedy left us and left a decision to people who know about government run health care in America. Massachusetts voted tonight between government control and freedom guided by their own specific experience at the 11th hour in the debate. The staggering coincidence of timing, importance, and message of this vote begs the question of providence.
Despite all the corrupt tactics, misinformation, strong arming, bribing, and political positioning, free people were given the choice between what I consider good and selfish evil in the world. Americans choose good.

This choice became possible by the passing of one man, made possible by the establishment of a free nation, decided upon by free men and is a message for all mankind. America is STILL the hope, the idea and the difficult path to freedom!

Reid's "racism"?

I believe Harry Reid was making a political analysis.  It was a valid analysis from the progressive "plantation owner" frame of mind, that groups people into class, race, age, sex, and other segments.  If I, as a conservative, strip away the belief in individuals and wear the hat of a progressive collectivist, it is a clear idea.  When all you can see and hear is someones group identity, then of course you will think that everyone else sees the same thing.

I am sure that the way Harry Reid views people in "levels of color" is a typical progressive ideology.  That has always been the way they view the people below themselves.

Recognizing Evil

Last night Media and I watched a movie about an Iranian girl that pointed out the complacency in the minds of people who are ruled by oppression. There is very little difference between tyrants of the various political persuasions. Oppression comes from a threat; a threat of physical force, a threat of being dishonored, a threat of social exile, a threat of fines, a threat of imprisonment, a threat to your livelihood.

This is what ACORN and the progressives do; they have done it in several Central American countries in the previous couple decades. It is a formula of political insurgency designed to demoralize and confuse a people into accepting the chains of oppression. We call it political correctness.

If you have any doubt that these are the tactics being used, here is Glenn Beck's latest report on how the Health Care debate was designed as a dishonest debate in 2006 by a felon while in prison for bank fraud.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-16VC3u64-0

The ends justify the means to these people. Does it really matter if it is a God that they feel is on their side, or some other ideology? If a person is not striving to be on the side of what is right (or God), and is justified in all action to accomplish an end... that is called evil.

http://www.doodooecon/

The Inconvenient Oath and the founder's vision of the Constitutional Republic

The Constitution is not about the will of the majority, it is about the judgment of the majority.

The founder's vision and the underpinning of our entire political order is not in leaders or in the common people but in their interaction under the Constitution's design for ordered liberty.

By disregarding the opinions of Americans and passing the health care bill, the government has undermined the very legitimacy of our Republican Constitution. With regard to health care, signing statements would allow President Obama to re-write the legislation as opposed to signing or veto. This poses a fundamental threat to our Constitutional Republic, as the majority of citizens' judgment and the basic interactive form of government is infringe upon. If President Obama uses signing statements to re-write the health care bill before enacting into law, our very form of government will be imperilled.


The President is supposed to represent Americans everywhere not sell policy by undermining the realistic transactions of information (truth). Pushing people to hear only what they want to hear and not hearing what they need to hear makes citizens lose touch with reality. This loss of reality leads to mistakes in judgment with regard to domestic and external threats. This will lead to national failure as history has shown.

We must begin to consider how to reform our Constitutional Republic and raze the power of government by removing power not specified in the Constitution. "Preserve, Protect and Defend the Constitution" has become An Inconvenient Oath.

Top 10 Reasons for Socialism!

1. Because one of us is smarter than all of us
2. Someone has to think for the masses
3. We need to get past old ideas like "We the People" and come up with something new
4. "I the Government" always works in your best interests
5. "I the Government" knows how to spend other peoples money
6. Spending our way out of recessions always works
7. Printing money is fun, it is like baking!
8. People have Tea Parties in your honor
9. We get to blame successful people and Capitalism for any failures
10. Borrowing our way out of deficits, sounds smart

Greed in the Obama Administration Treasury Department

While America has been focused on Wall Street greed, the Obama administration has been fighting its own personal demons of greed.

"Frank Brosens, a hedge-fund manager and big Democratic donor, was considered the top contender to run the Treasury's Troubled Asset Relief Program." Treasury's Top Candidate to Run TARP Drops Out, The Wall Street Journal.

After reviewing the TARP plan, the Taconic Capital hedge fund co-founder dropped out of running for the treasury job so that his hedge fund can take a prime position in the auctions to acquire billions of dollars of tax payer matching funds. Special consideration from the Treasury Department and administration will guarantee obscene profits for Taconic Capital.

Not only is this move greedy, it flies in the face of patriotism. Wouldn't you think that the well-being of millions of Americans would override Democratic greed?

Taconic Capital should not be eligible for the TARP plan after this greedy outrage, but the administration's greed does not stop there.

After learning that Chris Dodd specifically added the amendment to give bonuses to AIG, we have now found out "Chris Dodd's Wife Also Paid by AIG".

Personally that is enough greed for me, but it keeps on coming...

Fifty billion of the Spendulous package is targeted directly for Al Gore's Alliance for Climate Protection green investments. At the cost of scientific reality and the US economy (CO2 Rules: The Anti-Stimulus) the administration is blatantly lining the pockets of its contributors.

Maxine Waters under scrutiny for bank ties as her husband is supposed to be on the board of a bank that was given $12 million in immediate bailout money. OneUnited Bank of Massachusetts, whom the Waters are shareholders, apparently did not have to go through the regular channels and was awarded money when they showed up for a congressional hearing.

"Treasury officials told the newspapers that Waters didn't tell them her husband, Sidney Williams, served on the bank's board of directors and has owned at least $250,000 in stock in the institution.

The bank, then considered to be in a precarious condition, received $12 million in December from the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), which was intended for healthy banks" according to Fox News. Barney Frank is also reported to be advocating this bank.

After spending $160 million on the inauguration, I suppose the rest is just par for the course...

Stand up with us against this outrage at http://www.doodooecon.com./ Grab a t-shirt and let everyone know what you think about this literally unbelievable Obama administration!