Sunday, November 20, 2011

Political Implications of Hypersonic Weapons

A U.S. Department of Defense "Conventional Prompt Global Strike" prototype was tested by the Army on November 18, 2011. The Pentagon announced:
Today the U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command/Army Forces Strategic Command conducted the first test flight of the Advanced Hypersonic Weapon (AHW) concept. At 6:30 a.m. EST (1:30 a.m. Hawaii-Aleutian Time), a first-of-its-kind glide vehicle, designed to fly within the earth’s atmosphere at hypersonic speed and long range, was launched from the Pacific Missile Range Facility, Kauai, Hawaii to the Reagan Test Site, U.S. Army Kwajalein Atoll.
The Defense Department added:
The data collected will be used by the Department of Defense to model and develop future hypersonic boost-glide capabilities."
I calculated the minimum test speed to be Mach 6.8 without access to the flight path but based upon minimum distance and available flight times. Hypersonic is classified as over Mach 5.0. The Army test vehicle was cone shaped and adds to the list of America's prototype Hypersonic weapons. A list including the Falcon Hypersonic Technology Vehicle 2 (HTV-2) and the Mach 20 X-51A Waverider.

A Congressional Research Service report said the weapons system would be able to maneuver to avoid flying over third party nations as it approached its target. The weapon will use a precision guidance system to home in on the target. Hypersonic weapons systems will reach targets anywhere in the world within 2 hours from U.S. bases. Foreign soil and naval launch platforms could put payload on target within minutes. Meandering above combat zones could provide the ability to strike targets in seconds.

At hypersonic speeds, weapons payloads may not require explosives to produce radiation-free impact zones similar to high density meteors. Strikes capabilities likely include deep penetration into hardened underground structures, surgical strikes and wide-area, radiation-free, low altitude detonations. These weapons systems could also render nuclear ICBM's obsolete through interception and preemptive strikes.

Since 2005, work has been progressing on hypersonic fighters in addition to the currently reported hypersonic drones/missiles. Hypersonic fighter to fighter combat would be too fast for conventional weapons, so laser, microwave or other directed energy weapons are required. Such fighters may be able to intercept other hypersonic weapons systems.

The Political Impact

Imagine an enemy country with the ability to strike the U.S. Congress, White House, Pentagon, or a campaign speech podium within a few minutes of locating an important American leader. Such non-nuclear capabilities would render our political system unworkable. Now, consider what leaders of America's enemies are being told today. Consider what leaders of ally nations are being told by their military advisers.

The impact of hypersonic weapons on geopolitics is going to be more profound than nuclear weapons. Essentially, no opposing nations' leadership is safe. American military could watch television broadcasts and in real-time surgically eliminate opposing leaders on-air. The threat of these weapons will cut off nations from their leadership structures. Taped broadcasts could be used, but in combat situations opposing nations would lose real-time command and control. Opposing leaders could not rally or comfort their peoples.

These developments could explain some of President Obama's military strategy decisions. Abandoning bases in Iraq, cutting next generation fighter programs, and even the unsustainable borrowing from the Chinese and printing money. This may explain why the media and members of the elitist political class have been so brazenly nonchalant about corrupt and criminal activity in support of the Obama administration and its cronies.

Is a world with multiple governments sustainable when opposing leadership is intimidated or instantaneously eliminated? Two opposing countries with hypersonic capabilities might get into a Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) cycle, but the deterrent of global nuclear destruction would be replaced by the revolutionary friendly Mutually Assured Political Destruction (MAPD) of the countries.

Is America's currently corrupt government worthy to take control of the world? The cesspool known as the United Nations is definitely not worthy.  The old adage, power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely, comes to mind. Elitists who cannot be challenged, that always works out well.

The title President does not fit a leader who does more than just preside over his "equals." Someone with command over this level of power, and a ruthless heart, would chose who is allowed to be opponents. The power at stake in the 2012 election is not about leading America. It is not about being the "leader of the free world." It is not about being the "most powerful man in the world." On the table is becoming the ONLY truly powerful person in the world, the Caesar.

How long have those with top secret clearance been discussing the implications of this technology?  Has it been this secret prospective power that has corrupted our political system? How many conspiracy theories are going to coincide with these revelations? Mayan calendar, check. New World Order, check. Revelations, check. Nostradamus, I don't know. Twelfth Imam, maybe. There are probably more conspiracy theories on The History Channel.

Stay tuned to for more perspectives and articles. Checkout for t shirts and gear to support our efforts.

Source Links

Saturday, November 19, 2011

Obama Finances Brazilian Petrobras Oil Spill

The Brazilian government oil company Petrobras received $2 billion in loan guarantees for a massive underwater drilling project from the Obama administration.  On November 8th, reports slowly started to leak that Petrobras' deep water oil fields are suffering an oil spill. The reported spill quantity has been exponentially growing ever since.

The drilling contractor is Transocean – the owner of the infamous Deepwater Horizon rig.  The well is part of the Chevron-operated Frade project in the Campos Basin, located 3,800 feet (1,200 meters) underwater, 230 miles (370 kilometers) off the northeastern coast of Rio de Janeiro state. Chevron employs over 700 employees in Brazil with a 51.7 percent stake in production at Frade. Brazilian oil giant Petrobras has thirty percent, and Frade Japan Petroleum consortium is in charge of the remainder.

It is unclear if the oil rig used by Chevron in Brazil had been moved from the Gulf of Mexico. Diamond Offshore (DO), a driller, told Forbes in March 2011 that they only had five rigs in the Gulf of Mexico and had already moved three rig out last year because of the moratorium.(Barack Obama imposed a 7 year offshore drilling ban* of the Atlantic and Pacific coasts, Alaska and the Gulf of Mexico. ) One went to Africa. One went to Egypt. The other went to Brazil, where Diamond has an office  in MacaĆ©, Rio de Janeiro.

It appears that Petrobras recieved a $308 million credit guarantee, of which JP Morgan is the lender, and the Export-Import Bank of the United States would be the guarantor of the loan. The credit was used by Petrobras to acquire drilling services and capital goods to dig for oil in the Santos Basin off the coast of Rio de Janeiro and Espirito Santos states.

At a March 19, 2011 business summit in Brasilia, Obama said: "At a time when we’ve been reminded how easily instability in other parts of the world can affect the price of oil, the United States could not be happier with the potential for a new, stable source of energy."  He did not mean banned domestic energy reserves which are four times as abundant as Brazilian reserves.

Obama appointee Fred P. Hochberg, current chairman and president Ex-Im Bank, declared that the bank approved the $2 billion preliminary loan underwriting to Petrobras "to encourage purchases of U.S. goods and services by Petrobras":
I chose Brazil as my first international destination for good reason: Brazil is a powerhouse among South American economies and offers tremendous opportunities for U.S. exporters in many sectors. I want Brazilians to know that Ex-Im Bank has the will and the capacity to finance their purchases of U.S. equipment, products and services.
Neither the Deepwater Horizon or this current dangerous deep water oil spill would likely have occurred if U.S. and Canadian on-shore oil reserves and pipelines were not banned and restricted. The bans and restrictions are purely for "green," crony capitalist, political donors who are pillaging the American people. According to Peter Schweizer's new Book Throw Them All Out, for every dollar members of Obama’s national finance committee raised, they received $24,783 in return in the form of DOE sweetheart loans, on average.

Notes and Updates

*December 1, 2010 - Effectively reinstated the ban on offshore drilling, placing the entire Pacific Coast, the entire Atlantic Coast, the Eastern Gulf and parts of Alaska off limits to future energy production until 2017 at the earliest.

November 8, 2011 - Announces a new draft 2012-2017 lease plan that closes the majority of the OCS to new energy production. The draft plan prohibits new offshore drilling and only allows lease sales to occur in areas that are already open. It includes lease sales in the Western Gulf of Mexico and Alaska - leaving portions of the Arctic and the entire Atlantic and Pacific Coasts off-limits to new energy production and job creation.

UPDATE: President Obama’s United States Department of Agriculture has delayed shale gas drilling in Ohio for up to six months by cancelling a mineral lease auction for Wayne National Forest (WNF). The move was taken in deference to environmentalists, on the pretext of studying the effects of hydraulic fracturing, killing 200,000 jobs!

Friday, November 18, 2011

Obama Administration Violates Law for Solyndra

Fellow San Diego Local Order of Bloggers writer B-Daddy of The Liberator Today posted today's LIE OF THE DAY. In doing so he beat me to the punch on this story, but the details deserve exposure. The Obama Administration's Department of Energy (DOE) knowingly violated the law to prop up Solyndra.

A single large political donor visited the White House 16 times as the Solyndra loan was under review.. George Kaiser invested in Solyndra and donated large amounts to the Obama campaign. He needed government guarantees that his investment would not go belly up. In return, Solyndra was submissive to left-wing political pressures. Pressures like delaying the announcement of layoffs until November 3rd, 2010. A delay that Energy Secretary Steven Chu admits that "...people in the loan department would know about it." and "I don't think it is a proper way to do business."

The violation is of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 Sec. 1702 section d(3). It is illegal for Department of Energy loans to allow the taxpayers to be subordinated to other investors. No other Department of Energy loans have allowed new investors to be repayed before taxpayer funding.  Here is the actual language of the law:

Energy Policy Act of 2005

    (d) Repayment.--
            (1) In general.--No guarantee shall be made unless the
        Secretary determines that there is reasonable prospect of
        repayment of the principal and interest on the obligation by the
            (2) Amount.--No guarantee shall be made unless the Secretary
        determines that the amount of the obligation (when combined with
        amounts available to the borrower from other sources) will be
        sufficient to carry out the project.
            (3) Subordination.--The obligation shall be subject to the
        condition that the obligation is not subordinate to other

The Obama Department of Energy made Solyndra loans subordinate to other investors including George Kaiser during the restructuring of debt.  Democrat Representative Gene Green of Texas' 29th district told Secretary Steve Chu during the hearing that "I don't think the taxpayers should be subordinate to new investors" and "those of us who were on the committee and actually helped draft that law and support that program did not intend that."

A draft legal opinion identifying the legal violation was submitted by law firm (and Department of Energy consultant firm) Morrison and Foster. This opinion was dismissed by General Council of the DOE Scott Harris and Susan Richardson, Chief Council of this loan program. These Obama administration lawyers were of the opinion that the subordination clause only applied to initial loans and not to restructured debt or subsequent loans. This opinion clearly violated the letter and intent of the law, so written requests for a Department of Justice review were ignored.  Finally, the DOE decision to illegally subordinate the Solyndra loan via restructuring debt was made PRIOR to preparation of the legal memo advising the Department of Energy.

So why would Secretary Steven Chu play ball with this scam?
1. There is no penalty designated to the violation of the Energy Policy Act of 2005.
2. It is not his money or hard work that was risked and lost.
3. It is green energy, so how can it be wrong?

Link to CSPAN video of hearing.

Update 11/22/2011

Tax Payers must pay an additional $14.3 million to retrain ALL Solyndra workers.

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Top 1% Pay for Professors

My understanding is that the top 1% of personal income earners in America make $343,927 and pay 36.73% of Federal personal income tax. As these people are hated by the unemployed, debt laden college students, anti-American capitalism opponents, socialists, anarchists and occupiers, maybe we should identified who comprises this elite group.

Enter with their growing list of university pay. University of California, San Diego alone payed 79 employees ABOVE this level of income in 2008. More proof of the unsustainable education bubble.

UPDATE OF SHAME: To add insult to injury, UCSD has been ranked as having the 5th worst professors in the country by the Princeton Review

Tea Party Meets Occupy San Diego

San Diego 1 PM, November 15, 2011 marks another turning point in the struggle for human freedom. Well, not really, but Rhonda Deniston of and several Tea Party supporters, including myself for the SoCal Tax Revolt Coalition, had a press conference at the #OccupySD location in support of Centre City Coffee owner Linda Jenson.

During the conference, the typical disagreements surfaced as a woman pretending to be "a billionaire" attempted to grab the spotlight by blaming the ills of society on the Tea Party and the rich. Other Occupiers raised their voices and made the endeavor difficult. In the words of Jerry Seinfeld, "yada yada yada..." That is all "dog bites man" stuff.

The Issues at Hand

Let's get real, the Tea Party arrived to support a small business woman, but there is a lot more to that story.  I got the other side of the story, the occupiers' side. Let's look at both sides and you can decide who is right.

Linda was run off from her business by the OccupySD crowd and the front of her car was smashed at her home. There are many aspects to this story including a support rally by San Diego City Councilman Carl DeMaio. Occupy participants claim that Linda had issues with homeless people obstructing business prior to the OccupySD event, but had no explanation about her car. An occupier added that she has been given a credit by the city, insinuating that she may be taking a vacation.

Occupiers were dismissive of Councilman DeMaio as a political opponent. Upon hearing these sentiments I mentioned some of the reasons he is supported by both fiscal conservatives and more libertarian Tea Party members. The change in attitude in the occupiers toward Councilman DeMaio was abrupt and surprising.

Several occupiers courteously took me on a tour of the coffee cart area and it did appear to be graffiti and damage free. There were tarps pulled over three sides of the cart.  Access was open from the remaining side and the internal items appeared unharmed.

My home has been the target of vandalism on a few occasions since my involvement with the Tea Party. My Facebook has been hacked for writing about the Chicago Precedent. My google accounts including this blog have been suspended at various levels (for writing about the global warming hoax). I understand left wing intimidation and the coffee cart being unharmed is not consistent.

Rhonda Deniston has been the target of occupy violence per her video. One very dishevelled occupier claimed to have been there and resembled the young man in the black scarf. He accused Rhonda of being rude and provocative but was not prepared to speak to the media with his side of the story.

Occupy/Tea Party Interaction

Beyond the reason for my attendance of the event, I attempted to discuss politics with a group of Occupiers. As mentioned above, they were engaged and courteous. A young man calling himself "Nexus" spent quite a bit of time talking to me, as did a large occupier named "Durg" who carried a red and black flag. Several of the group claimed to be veterans and one wore a "veterans for peace" tshirt.

During my discussion, I asked if books or other informative items would be welcomed by the occupiers. After some deliberation, they agreed that pocket constitutions would be appropriate. Books had previously been removed and only items that could be carried conveniently are now seen as practical.

A major question asked was why the Tea Party had guns and OccupySD was not allowed signs large enough to be considered weapons.  I explained some of their rights but fundamentally they felt that Constitutional rights should trump local authority.  We left that discussion at the doorstep of states' rights.

One item that struck me was the claim that many occupiers are fiscal conservatives. First, it was good to see that they are educated enough to understand the term fiscal conservative. It was an appeal to common ground which is as dangerous a political position for the Tea Party as it is for the Democrat Party.

My main point of discussion was about cannon fodder. When a group of "expendables" are used to engage enemy forces not knowing that cannons will be used upon both the enemy and themselves once entangled in battle. I supported the calls for nonviolence that Rhonda espoused during the conference, adding that calls for restrictions upon occupier liberties will be applied to all other groups who stand up against big government or its cronies.

Occupy Movement Political Implications 

"Idle hands do the devil's work" is the adage that comes to mind. The occupiers are unemployed and free from commitments to attend to. Tea Party members typically work and cannot attend 1 PM news conferences, let alone sleep in tents for weeks and months.  The occupy movement, in my opinion, is a plan by the elitist left to employ the idle hands their policies have created in pursuit of several goals:
  • Battle harden their next generation of political insurgents as they see colleagues harshly treated by authority and media figures.
  • Demonize opponents of the statist, big government agenda by desensitizing the general public to activism. Activism will be slotted as a dirty, fleabagger, dangerous and possibly criminal activity.
  • Harsh Darwinian "Sink or Swim" political training that will force certain individuals to survive and become useful pawns to advance the extreme left anti-capitalist agenda in the future.
  • Create a false impression of a large, dangerous, extreme left movement that makes the "moderate" socialists look reasonable.
  • Triangulate "moderate" socialists between the extreme left occupiers and the "right-wing" Tea Party.
To accomplish these goals the Occupy movement must evolve through the following "marketing" steps:
  1. Advertise - make the public aware of Occupy's existence.
  2. Demonize - show the public that Occupy is a "bottom-up" danger.  (Create the need)
  3. Criminalize - call for authoritarian "top-down" solutions to the problem of protestors. (Fill the need)
Consider for a moment that the left is full of people who lived through the sixties and seventies as radical activists. They have first-hand knowledge of what worked and what did not, and why. The Occupy movement, like progressive political policies, is designed to fail in order to enrich an elitist political class through expendables, dependents and useful idiots. Consider the negative connotations of the language "Occupy."

Any movement, living in squalor, beset by radicals and including fringe elements, will eventually have individuals commit heinous and deplorable acts. The movement will react to those events and be an easy target for public outrage, outrage focused upon both the individuals involved and the movement as it reacts. The sixties and seventies radical left activists remember this, teach this, and use this. This tactic is often used against conservatives who aspire to a set of high standards but, being human, make mistakes that can be exploited as "hypocritical."  The application of this tactic is only slightly different when creating groups to demonize as opposed to demonizing opponents. Machiavelli would be proud, but the myth of the compassionate left is clear.

Friday, November 11, 2011

Donations from Add Up!

A few months ago when Herman Cain was a long shot nominee, Doo Doo Economics was impressed by his bold 9-9-9 plan. To support the economic discussion, I founded to sell my original pro-Cain bumper stickers and tshirt graphics. All proceeds from this website are donated to the Herman Cain campaign. So far, $50 has been donated thanks to your purchases.

Thursday, November 10, 2011

The Consumer Product Safety Commission - Window "BLIND" Crony Capitalism

In what can only be described as Obama appointee Inez Tenenbaum's extremism, The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) spewed a divisive letter to the Window Covering Manufacturers Association on June 1, 2011. This letter is now followed up with an attempt to "eliminate the strangulation hazard" that has cost the lives several children over the last two decades.

Note the tone of the following excerpt from this letter:
Moreover, I encourage you to guard against accepting revised requirements that would continue to allow strangulation risks in window coverings out of a misplaced desire for convenience, aesthetics, or placating anyone who may wish to continue moving slowly, rather than proactively addressing this longstanding problem once and for all. I reaffirm to you my call for a comprehensive revised voluntary standard that eliminates-not just reduces-the strangulation risks from window coverings.

(sorry for any typos as the source document is protected from text selection)

The Wall Street Journal points out:
Pulling strings for Ms. Tenenbaum is Illinois Democrat Dick Durbin, who has inserted language into a financial appropriations bill that would allow the CPSC to write new mandatory regulations for the blinds industry without having to go through the usual procedures. Under the 1972 Consumer Product Safety Act, enacting mandatory regulations requires the CPSC to provide data showing that voluntary standards aren't working, as well as some reasonable cost-benefit analysis.

That's a fairly high bar, and one the CPSC would be unlikely to clear in this instance. So under Mr. Durbin's plan, the CPSC would instead be able to create mandatory regulations through the unorthodox use of an easier standard in the Administrative Procedures Act. Abracadabra, political problem solved.

The CPSC estimates that about 12 children a year die in accidents with window blinds. Every death or injury of a child is tragic, but the risk posed by blinds is dwarfed by other common dangers. According to Consumer Reports, more than 5,000 children a year are injured or killed falling out of open windows and through window screens. Electrical outlets also pose a risk, but no one has suggested removing those through regulation.
In October 2011 news, Horizon Shades by B&W Window Fashions (1705 Waukegan Rd. • Waukegan, IL 60085 • Phone 800-858-2352 • Fax 800-858-8556) launched a patent pending, first cordless standard window shade. The window shade happens to be targeted at eliminating safety hazards to children. has the full story on this product backed by crony capitalism. I wonder if ties between Durbin, Tenenbaum and donors at B & W Window Fashions will be uncovered?

UPDATE: 2011: Sheila Decoster, 62, died from asphyxiation after falling head first into a recycling bin at her home in Toledo, Ohio. When will the CPSC fight for the elimination of these safety hazards? The blue bins ARE RECYCLING PEOPLE!

Tea Party Saves Christmas...Fees.

After a deluge of emails and mocking the absurd Obama administration plan for a 15-cent "fee" on Christmas trees has been scrapped. The fee to retail Christmas tree sales was described as meant to pay for a promotional program in response to artificial trees. Grinching Christmas and picking winners-and-loser was initially embraced by the Obama administration until conservatives and Tea Party citizen journalists caught scent of the scheme.

"Fees for Trees" was poised to go down as another "Cash for Clunkers" style misstep.  A "smack in the face to each and every American who celebrates Christmas," accoding to Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La). The National Christmas Tree Association asked to receive the gift of crony capitalism for Christmas, but ended up with a lump of coal in its stocking...

“I can tell you unequivocally that the Obama administration is not taxing Christmas trees,” White House spokesman Matt Lehrich said.

Tuesday, November 8, 2011

The Best Show on Television: Strike Back

For my Tea Party friends, I want to point out the best show on television. Strike Back can be found on Cinemax.  (Take note of the artwork in the intro.) The show is a mix of James Bond and Western Anti-Terrorism black ops with some great plot twists. The lead actors are believable and the action scenes are epic.

The plot lines are very current and believable. Watch your back, while you watch this show...
I added a little suprise at the bottom of this post, so read it all!

U.S. Intro

U.K. Intro

Tea Party Intro

Sunday, November 6, 2011

Why to Support Citizen Journalists

Rights and liberties in America are found in the 5th Amendment and the Bill of Rights. Individual rights limit the powers of government. Key to this limitation of government power has been the protective power of the press. This power of the press has become increasingly compromised over the last several years.

Consequently, the lack of protection against expansive and corrupt government power can be seen in the unquestioned actions of Barack Obama. Numerous lies are now commonly unchallenged in the traditional media. Many of us on the side of freedom have concluded that the old media is now an agent working against the rights and liberties of We The People. However, we must acknowledge that this old media empire is crumbling and cornered. Starved of financial resources, the old school newspapers and television stations are at risk. Once fully staffed journalistic endeavors are now skeletons who cannot carry out their traditional duties. Their compliance may simply be due to desperation.

Lets take the most optimistic view of traditional media and the issue of Barack Obama comparing himself to Abraham Lincoln. The LA Times and CNN could not resist this half-baked exercise in journalism:

There are, in fact, some parallels. Both had distant fathers and were raised in families of few means. Both had curiosity, devouring studies. Both became lawyers and settled in Illinois. Both got their start in Illinois state politics, served only a short time in Congress and upset political giants in their long-shot bids for the presidency. Lincoln narrowly bested William H. Seward and Obama, well, remember Hillary Rodham Clinton? Funny thing is, both Seward and Clinton were U.S. senators from New York.
Of course for many, the singular comparison is that both Lincoln and Obama are marvelous orators, given to soaring rhetoric that can lift a nation at a time of war and economic hardship.
So CNN might be forgiven for morphing their faces

The tragedy of this comparison is that it gives Obama tacit approval to ignore the U.S. Constitution, as they ignorantly attribute Lincoln's suspension of Habeas Corpus due to an "emergency." President Lincoln may roll over in his grave at comparisons between these two problems. Lincoln was self educated but brilliant enough to study the situations he faced by the illumination of the U.S. Constitution. Even President Lincoln's suspension of Habeas Corpus was not a political move to promote an agenda, it was a reaction within constitutional limits to preserve The Republic after 11 states had succeeded and Maryland was in question.
Constitution Article 1 Section 9 Clause 2: The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.
A financial collapse would not have ended the Union. The lack of ObamaCare or Global Warming regulations would not threaten the Union. To be frank, these political agenda provoke rebellion. There are no clauses in The Constitution enumerating power to provide health insurance or support the elitist belief in climate religion. The left is devoted to creating a dependency class for political purposes. The Constitution is devoted to individual rights and liberties and swings toward dictatorial powers only when The Republic is endangered.

President Lincoln faithfully executed his office and would never have misused the argument of departmental constitutional interpretation to stop enforcement of The Defense of Marriage Act. President Lincoln would not remove the blindfold to race at the Department of Justice. President Lincoln would not have obstructed justice in the investigation into Solyndra by Congressional Energy and Commerce Committee. President Lincoln would not have run guns to the southern states to push a political agenda. Yet, the traditional media does not bring these issues to the forefront of national debate. Instead, these threats to all of our rights and liberties are overshadowed by hyped accusations against Herman Cain.

It is up to citizen journalists to pursue truth now. So please forgive the blogging world as it learns to shoulder the burdens once carried by large corporate institutions. Please forgive our zealousness in promoting our efforts, but unless we learn to overcome the financial obstacles, truth will go from being covered up to never being uncovered. Without truth, corruption and evil dominate.

Friday, November 4, 2011

Failed Liberal Ideas Website Sweeps Talk Radio

I do not get enough time to listen to all the talk radio conservatives. On a good day of driving between clients, I pick up an idea or two. As I switched between the radio breaks, nearly all the stations were commenting upon I have to admit my jealousy at the massive exposure, and my failure to have come up with this simply brilliant idea. The site is organized as a survey. After your assessment of the various boondoggles, you are asked to add your name to a petition.

Here is a quick breakdown of the some failed liberal ideas that you rate on the site.
  1. The War on Poverty
  2. The U.S. Department of Education
  3. The U.S. Department of Energy
  4. The Community Reinvestment Act
  5. 'Comprehensive' Immigration Reform
Dennis Prager commented that he does not know of one liberal idea, opposed by conservatives, that has not failed. Rush Limbaugh simply told his listeners to fill out the survey in a glowing tone.  This type of conservative coverage is impressive for such a small site, give it a look, but I was expecting more of a library of items to review.

Tuesday, November 1, 2011

Which "Top 1%" Does #OccupyWallStreet Hate?

Whenever I hear the "99%" slogan of #OccupyWallStreet, the math stands out as wrong. OccupyWallStreet should actually be the "98.3%." As any historian can tell you, attacks upon "the rich" and "bankers" come back to a very specific group that must only be named with leftist code language. This group is actually 1.7% of the American population, not the marketing tested 1%.  Read this quietly so as not to disturb your politically correct neighbors,"the jews."

The Jewish population of the United States comprises about 1% of the American public.

South America393,221,000335,1000.09%
Central America*195,427,00054,5000.03%
North America343,018,0005,650,0001.65%
(statistical things that make ya go hmm...)
U.S.A., Canada & Mexico*538,445,0005,704,5001.06%

Maybe it is time to ask exacty which "top 1%" the occupiers mean to punish for  "fairness". Maybe I have this all wrong and they just need some social justice "elbow room." However, lets draw the line at #OccupyPoland, please.

If you are an #OccupyWallStreet supporter, you should consider who set this movement up and why. I am warning you that you are being used as cannon fodder. Watch closely for the media and your progressive overlords to start demonizing you and then criminalizing you. The more the general public calls for action against you, the more power is centralized against all individuals. The only progress in progressivism is toward slavery and oppression.




Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...